On arguments that may be, and sometimes must be, made

In the Light of the Law

I have taken no position on the Correctio Filialis. I know and respect some of its signatories as I do some of its critics but, as the document itself seems to fall within the boundaries of Canon 212, I say, ‘Have at it folks and may the better arguments prevail’. That said, some recent arguments against the Correctio are, in my view, subtly deficient and, time permitting, I will reply to them.

But even before that, I wish to reply to an attitude I perceive emerging against the Correctio, one that attempts to dissuade Correctio supporters from their position by alleging a disastrous—but supposedly logical—consequence of their being right, something along these lines: If Amoris laetita and/or Pope Francis and/or his Vatican allies are really as bad as the authors of the Correctio seem to believe, then all petitions, Dubia, and corrections will do no good. Prayer and…

View original post 422 more words

One thought on “On arguments that may be, and sometimes must be, made

  1. Thank you for quoting and linking to that post. My view is that is a refreshingly rational look at a situation that often reminds me more of a late-night argument at the corner bar/pub – or worse – than a discussion between sober and sane grown-ups.

    I also think that the Pope is Catholic, and not exactly like every other one. Which is pretty much the same as the Catholic experience for the last two millennia.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s